NASA DECEPTION: Film Fakery Remains Totally Transparent

Never Address Serious Allegations (NASA) Forever Dishonest

During Apollo 12 one of the cameras suffered a malfunction after the lens had been pointed towards the sun. Although the viewing public was told at the time that the camera had burned out the lens is still working. The camera did not actually burn out at all.

Lenses Did Not Burn Out As Conspiracists Contended

The very same thing happened on Apollo 15 where the camera lens did not burn out. It is interesting to note that during the Apollo 16 mission, one of the astronots who was being told by Houston to adjust the camera asked if he should point the camera towards the sun?

Astronots Wondered About Aiming Cameras Toward Sun

Even though the manual from the camera specifically points out not to do this! You may be interested to see what the astronots say on this film while this camera fiasco was taking place.

PLEASE FORGIVE ABSENCE OF ACTUAL FOOTAGE! It does exist. Or, at least, it did.

NASA DECEPTION: All Moon Rocks Still Untouched On Moon

Moon Rocks Bogus As Never Address Serious Allegations (NASA)

Allegedly 750 pounds or so were said to be collected on the Apollo missions. This may be so, but according to official NASA records, only a couple of pounds were actually collected by the astronots.

Easy To Promote Fakes As Actual Moon Rocks

It would not be impossible to irradiate a rock or put it in a vacuum to get the same results.

Moon Rocks Have Extremely Terrestrial Origin

Did you know that two years before the Apollo 11 mission its lead scientist Nazi war criminal Werner Braun made a trip to Antartica which is a prime area for the collection of Moon rocks?

NASA DECEPTION: Stars Eliminated For Tactical Reasons

Deletion Of Stars By Conspirators No Accident

Skeptics argue that the lack of stars on Moon photographs is acceptable despite zero atmosphere to obscure the view. Yuri Gagarin pronounced the stars to be "astonishingly brilliant".

Star Formations Can Prove Forgery Without Doubt

See the official NASA pictures that I have reproduced that show 'stars' in the sky as viewed from the lunar surface. Why exactly do you think there are hardly any stars visible on Apollo films taken from the moon?

Professional Sky Watchers Would Expose Bogus Lies

The answers simple! Professional sky watchers would quickly calculate that the configuration and distances of star formations were incorrect and so NASA had to remove them to make sure they could keep up the scam.

NASA DECEPTION: Manufactured Footage Space Program Specialty

Cameras Unable To Take Moon Photos As Astronots Allege

Hasselblad was the manufacturer of the camera that took all of the photos on the Apollo missions. Jan Lundberg was the Manager Of Space Projects at Hasselblad from 1966 to 1975 and responsible for the production and building of the Hasselblad 500 EL/70 cameras that were used on the Apollo Missions.

Camera Expert Goes On Record In Regard To Alterations

He says 'Originally NASA made all the alterations themselves, then they presented what they had done to us and asked if we could do the same, to which we replied yes we can, and we can do it better. We proceeded to make the alterations that were accepted by NASA.' Protective plates were added to the case and film magazine.

NASA DECEPTION: Obvious Faked Photo Insults Populace

This picture from Apollo 15 is really quite an amazing feat of camera work if you consider that it was taken without any means of knowing if everything was in shot. No viewfinder, no one to tell you if everything is in shot. Isn't it strange that the only thing visible on the dark part of the Lunar Lander is the American Flag? You cannot put that down to two light sources. More likely a NASA artist and an airbrush! This picture was later used on postcards and NASA advertising.

NASA DECEPTION: Who Was Mystery Moon Cameraman?

Did you know that this picture is the only close-up picture taken of Neil Armstrong on the moon" A bit strange considering that he was the first man to step onto the lunar surface. Why only one picture of the first man on the moon?

NASA DECEPTION: Plausible Deniability Government Tool

Bogus Space Program Completely Illogical

Let us try and put this all into perspective. Let us compare the Apollo coverup with the USSR launch of the dog called Laika into space. She was launched into space to see what the effects of Space travel would have on a live creature.

Laika Died Horrible Lingering Death In Cruel Experiment

It was publicly announced that Laika died painlessly when her oxygen supply ran out, but the truth was finally revealed many years later that the dog had in fact died when the front nose cone of the craft carrying her had been ripped off after reaching Earth orbit and that the dog probably died from the intense heat of the sun.

Dog Death Known Well In Advance By Planners

Further investigations revealed that the nose cone had actually been designed to do this. So, in fact, the makers of the rocket had known that the dog would die even before she was sent into space. This evidence took 30 years to be revealed to the general public.

Yuri Gagarin Exploits Nothing More Than Fabricated Myth

Also consider the recent revelation that Yuri Gagarin was not the first person to orbit Earth as first claimed by Russia.

Need To Know Compartments Perfect For Big Lie

Thousands of people were employed to work on the Apollo mission but very few people had access to the complete picture. By giving several people a small role in the missions meant that they would not see the whole project.

NASA DECEPTION: War Criminal Heads USA Space Program

Propaganda Machinery Works Overtime To Totally Clean Nazi Image

Over the course of 20 years Werhner Braun received approximately 25 honorary degrees and he accepted many other awards and medals, presented to him from small cities, to Never Address Serious Allegations (NASA) and even President John Kennedy. His dossier was apparently rewritten so he did not appear an enthusiastic Nazi.

Braun Considered Good Old Guy By Brainwashed Americans

Braun attempted to play down his real Nazi involvement by claiming "In 1939 I was officially demanded to join the National Socialist Party. At this time I was already Technical Director at Peenemünde. The technical work had attracted attention at higher and higher levels. Thus, my refusal to join the party would have meant that I would have to abandon the work of my life.

Mutilitation Of Truth Simple As Prisoner Mutiliation For Hard Core Nazi

"My membership in the party did not include any political activity." However, this Braun claim was simply untrue, for other scientists successfully used an old rule of the Weimar Republic that was still in use, forcing anyone in the military to abstain from political affiliation.

NASA DECEPTION: Film Crosshairs Expose Liars

Film Not Lie But Never Address Serious Allegations (NASA) Is

An important factor to take into consideration is the great variations in temperature that the film would have had to endure whilst on the lunar surface. The temperature during the Apollo missions were recorded as being between -180F in the shade to an incredible +200F in full sunshine.

Astronots Must Have Utilized Super Film Made On Krypton

How could the film emulsion have withstood such temperature differences? The astronauts can be seen to move between the shadows of the rocks and then into full sunlight in some shots. Surely the film would have perished under such conditions?

Strange That Magic Film Has Never Gone Public

If the film used during the Apollo missions had such qualities as to withstand such differences in temperature why are Kodak not publicly selling them in today's market?

Crosshairs Most Damning Of Film Evidence Against Liars

On all Apollo footage there should be crosshairs or reticules present on the film. These crosshairs were, according to NASA, placed on the film to help calculate distances on the Moon. The crosshairs were actually built into the camera and therefore should be visible on every single picture taken by the astronauts on the surface of the Moon.

How Many Cameramen Were Actually On Moon Set?

Incidentally, an unimpeachable film expert has stated that the only way that you could calculate the distance in the shot using the crosshairs would be if you had two cameras set up to take a stereo picture!

NASA DECEPTION: Film Crosshairs Proof Of Fakery

Take a look at the picture presented to see that parts of the crosshairs have disappeared from the film. This is impossible unless the film has been tampered with. The crosshairs should be completely visible in all shots and not hidden behind objects in the pictures. The only solution must be that NASA has gone to the trouble of either airbrushing out certain objects in the film, or added them over the crosshairs!

NASA DECEPTION: Blue Sky Anamoly Leaves NASA Feeling Blue

Blue Sky Where No Blue Sky Could Possibly Be

By the time of the Apollo 13 Mission in April 1970, public interest in space travel was beginning to diminish. This could have been partly due to most of the previous Apollo 12 Mission having to rely mainly on an audio transmission, due to the camera malfunctions encountered.

Apollo 13 Disaster Lie Drummed Up To Generate Interest

Was this a factor in the alleged near disaster on the Apollo 13 mission? Were NASA trying to get back the publics attention and therefore guarantee the continued funding of the US Government? On the 13th hour of the 13th day of the 13th Apollo Mission, disaster struck when an oxygen tank exploded.

No Blue Sky Can Exist 200,000 Miles From Earth Atmosphere

Film shows the astronauts from the Apollo 13 just before they transferred to the LEM the craft is allegeded to be some 200,000 miles from Earth. If we look out of the window we see blue sky? How can this be if they are in deep space? Surely the windows should be showing black space unless they are in near Earth orbit of course?

PLEASE FORGIVE ABSENCE OF ACTUAL FOOTAGE! It does exist. Or, at least, it did.

NASA DECEPTION: Matte Backgrounds Laughable

Case Of Mysterious Ever Present Moon Mountains

One of the main anomalies that leads me to believe that the Moon footage was taken on a film set is the fact that the same mountains appear on different Apollo missions which are supposed to be landed several hundreds of miles from each other.

Mountains Must Have Moved Around For Astronots

In sequences you will even see the camera pan across the landscape that at one point includes the Lunar Landing Module. In another shot from the same mission, we see the very same mountains, but no Lander? How can this be when the mountains appear to be exactly the same distance away from the camera?

Laziness In Creating Fake Footage Visible For All To View

This film shows two different Apollo missions, which are supposed to be in different areas of the Moon, but show the exact same mountains in the background.

NASA DECEPTION: Some Reasons For All Lies

Why would NASA fake the Apollo Missions?

I think the main reason why the US Government and NASA faked the 'official record' is because they could not be seen to be the weak link, especially when you consider that during the 60's, the USA were at the height of the Cold War with Russia.

Why Turn Down Billions In Untracked Tax Dollars?

Also their own President had forecast that before the end of the 60's Man would be on the Moon. It would be better to try and fool the public and hoax the footage, rather than let their biggest rival in the World strike a huge moral victory by beating them to the Moon.

Smoke And Mirrors Keep Gullible Americans Hoodwinked

If man really went to the Moon, why did NASA drop the successful Saturn 5 launch rocket after the last Apollo mission? The shuttle weighs three fourths heavier than the Saturn 5 Rocket, puts only one sixth of cargo weight into orbit and costs three times as much to launch.

Shuttle Program Was Basically To Appease Baaing Sheep

The shuttle is basically a glider with no escape for the crew if things go wrong (as we all know they do). Why scrap a rocket that can outperform its newer model? The Shuttle was first flown two years behind schedule.

NASA DECEPTION: Blast Crater Absence Physical Impossibility

There should have been a substantial crater blasted out under the LM's 10,000 pound thrust rocket. Skeptics would have you believe that the engines only had the power to blow the dust from underneath the LM as it landed. If this is true, how did Neil Armstrong create that famous boot print if all the dust had been blown away?